<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lets Get Geeky with the Omega Speedmaster Reduced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49</link>
	<description>Omega Watch Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-40501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-40501</guid>
		<description>I might grow a mustache, and watch moon-raker again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might grow a mustache, and watch moon-raker again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-37446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-37446</guid>
		<description>Is the Speedmaster the one that went to the Moon, and the speedmaster reduced the one poor people pretend went to the moon?

They are quite a nice watch I got a reduced, and will now save up for the master speedmaster. I would go around in short sleves all the time if I had on of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Speedmaster the one that went to the Moon, and the speedmaster reduced the one poor people pretend went to the moon?</p>
<p>They are quite a nice watch I got a reduced, and will now save up for the master speedmaster. I would go around in short sleves all the time if I had on of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-37445</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-37445</guid>
		<description>YAWN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAWN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross duncanson</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-36724</link>
		<dc:creator>ross duncanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-36724</guid>
		<description>i will get gordon duncansons  watch because i am his bro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i will get gordon duncansons  watch because i am his bro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilo</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-30258</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-30258</guid>
		<description>wjg - The reduced signifys the size of the watch.  I think it is 39mm vs. 41 or 42mm.  And the reduced models have an automatic movement vs. a manual winding movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wjg &#8211; The reduced signifys the size of the watch.  I think it is 39mm vs. 41 or 42mm.  And the reduced models have an automatic movement vs. a manual winding movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-25123</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-25123</guid>
		<description>I like these watches very much. i seen on in the shop the other day, but i got a Casio instead cos i had not got the money.

Hope to buy one in a few years so I can be cool like Gordon Duncanson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like these watches very much. i seen on in the shop the other day, but i got a Casio instead cos i had not got the money.</p>
<p>Hope to buy one in a few years so I can be cool like Gordon Duncanson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wjg</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-12559</link>
		<dc:creator>wjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 02:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-12559</guid>
		<description>Have a 3513.50.  What does &quot;reduced&quot; signify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a 3513.50.  What does &#8220;reduced&#8221; signify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-4447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-4447</guid>
		<description>I would like to talk bout the (145014)  - Omega Speedmaster Professional Mark II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to talk bout the (145014)  &#8211; Omega Speedmaster Professional Mark II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-3865</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-3865</guid>
		<description>This post is proof positive that not everything a geek loves has to be electronic, Far from it in fact: while much of what is intricate, avant garde, and/or otherwise regarded as a technological achievement happens to involve electronic components there are exceptions to the rule.

At first blush one might expect the garden variety geek to wear some modern descendant of the digital calculator watch of the 80&#039;s such as the Casio Wave Ceptor complete with its atomic clock signal receiver that ensures its accuracy will easily eclipse that of watches such as my 16570 Explorer II. Ultra &#039;techy geeky&#039; types might be expected to flock to the solar powered version of the same watch, while those geeks with more upscale tastes might be thought to prefer something Swiss made such as Tissot&#039;s T-Touch.

Thanks for pointing out this is not always (or perhaps even usually) the case! Suffice to say that calling &#039;old school&#039; non-electric/electronic watches &#039;mechanical marvels&#039; here would be preaching to the proverbial choir however including many who employ and enjoy the &#039;bleeding edge&#039; of electronic innovation amongst those who appreciate the finer qualities of a watch with a beating heart is refreshing. The stereotypical geek is after all most often accused of having predicted the demise of the mechanical watch during the quartz/digital watch revolution which very nearly sank the Swiss watch industry.

In short: very cool post.I just acquired a used Omega Speedmaster Reduced Schumacher red dial (ref #3810.61.41) with an 1143 movement and steel bracelet and am enjoying it a great deal.

Cheers,

- Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is proof positive that not everything a geek loves has to be electronic, Far from it in fact: while much of what is intricate, avant garde, and/or otherwise regarded as a technological achievement happens to involve electronic components there are exceptions to the rule.</p>
<p>At first blush one might expect the garden variety geek to wear some modern descendant of the digital calculator watch of the 80&#8217;s such as the Casio Wave Ceptor complete with its atomic clock signal receiver that ensures its accuracy will easily eclipse that of watches such as my 16570 Explorer II. Ultra &#8216;techy geeky&#8217; types might be expected to flock to the solar powered version of the same watch, while those geeks with more upscale tastes might be thought to prefer something Swiss made such as Tissot&#8217;s T-Touch.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out this is not always (or perhaps even usually) the case! Suffice to say that calling &#8216;old school&#8217; non-electric/electronic watches &#8216;mechanical marvels&#8217; here would be preaching to the proverbial choir however including many who employ and enjoy the &#8216;bleeding edge&#8217; of electronic innovation amongst those who appreciate the finer qualities of a watch with a beating heart is refreshing. The stereotypical geek is after all most often accused of having predicted the demise of the mechanical watch during the quartz/digital watch revolution which very nearly sank the Swiss watch industry.</p>
<p>In short: very cool post.I just acquired a used Omega Speedmaster Reduced Schumacher red dial (ref #3810.61.41) with an 1143 movement and steel bracelet and am enjoying it a great deal.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>- Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aide</title>
		<link>http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-3749</link>
		<dc:creator>aide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omegablogger.com/archives/49#comment-3749</guid>
		<description>gordon is a wank
gordon is a spastic
gordon is a gin.
I appreciate all works of Omega art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gordon is a wank<br />
gordon is a spastic<br />
gordon is a gin.<br />
I appreciate all works of Omega art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

